Settings and activity
31 results found
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
3 votes
Ken Reso
shared this idea
·
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ken Reso
commented
ProTrader users already have access to these MAs, to support UniSearch crossovers. The values for the set available in the Unisearch crossovers are probably already calculated in the database, before the search is executed (db indexing).
Consider adding a "Display Only" option in the ProTrader "Value" editor for crossovers, as is done for RMA.
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ken Reso
commented
Work-around is to run to the next-to-last day, issue a "Close All", then run to the last day, removing pending new positions. This method includes the commission, at the Open Price on the end date (one day earlier than VV6 online).
I do this, if I want the final holdings into the trade history. It's only a test, an approximation. Though, the work around is a bit cumbersome.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ken Reso
commented
John,
I have done this with VV7. It just taked a little getting used to.
Click the top-left cell, hold the SHIFT key, and click the bottom-right cell. If that bottom-right parameter causes a popup menu, just hit ESCape. The entire block of parameter cells is still selected/highlighted.
You must use CTRL-C. There is no VV menu to "copy".
When pasted into MS Word, it pastes as a table. You can then format borders around it, to see it as "cells".
It doesn't bring the sort. I type these manually.
This has saved me a few times, when either I, or VV7, drops parameters from my searches!!!!
-
2 votesKen Reso
shared this idea
·
-
11 votes
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ken Reso
commented
My understanding of this is as follows: When building a search/strategy for MTI, such as MTI>1.1, it means "when MTI > 1.1". Also, include it in custom fields, such as "(VST+MTI) < 4.0".
-
4 votes
-
211 votes
-
517 votes
Allowing OBV to be configured to some number of periods, OBV[1], would be useful. I think it would also solve the objective of the histogram (OBV[1]).
Changes for OBV[10] could be seen more easily, without being flattended by the magnitide of price/volume changes that took place 3-6 months prior.