Settings and activity
31 results found
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment -
4 votes
Cem Kaner
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesCem Kaner
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Cem Kaner
commented
My broker charges a significant fee at tax time for dealing with K-1's. It would benefit me to avoid them.
However, I suspect that this would require a lot of work. I would appreciate the feature, but recognize that this might be a request that is too expensive to fill.
Cem Kaner
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteCem Kaner
shared this idea
·
-
4 votesCem Kaner
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesCem Kaner
supported this idea
·
-
Add a field or column to stock viewer, watchlist & pf mgr that user can update with comments & notes
5 votesCem Kaner
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesCem Kaner
supported this idea
·
-
290 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Cem Kaner
commented
As with many other comments, my primary request is for the portfolio to allow me to enter negative amounts, so that I can account for long calls and long puts. My second-priority request is to associate the option income (and expense) with a security, as I do with dividends. The idea of an option portfolio is intriguing, but it will take you a lot of work to implement. Even though I do a substantial amount of option trading, and would find this useful, I think this is a separable idea and a much longer term project.
Cem Kaner
supported this idea
·
-
311 votesCem Kaner
supported this idea
·
VectorVest has a fundamentally different theory of "value" than Morningstar. Both of them use a fundamentally different valuation approach than Motley Fool, than GuruFocus, than TipRanks (etc.).
I don't think there is a "right" here. I think there are potentially divergent signals, and when there are significant differences, I think that can be useful for stimulating a deeper risk analysis of that security.