Settings and activity
70 results found
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Michael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Ellis
commented
Absolutely critical. Is actually the heart of VV. Shocked it's not on the front page. Current Color Guard needs to be on the front page. The Advanced Color Guard has PW, which is nice, but it needs to go all the way and put in ALL of the other indicators, too (DEW/CC, etc). Actual values are also imperative. The little arrows are cute, but not really necessary. One way or the other, all of the above needs to be on the front page.
Michael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesMichael Ellis
shared this idea
·
-
19 votesMichael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesMichael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
48 votesMichael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
59 votesMichael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
113 votesMichael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
115 votes
We are planning on adding these Market Timing conditions to BackTester soon.
Michael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
154 votesMichael Ellis
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Ellis
commented
First suggested in 2010. It's 2021. Should we just give up on the idea of folders in the backtests? Seems like such a simple change to implement.
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Ellis
commented
Absolutely. Keeping them all straight is a significant challenge. Folders would make organizing them really simple.
-
175 votesMichael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
276 votesMichael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
268 votesMichael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
317 votesMichael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Ellis
commented
To clarify a little, adding a minimum of ATR (10) and ATR(14), the two most common periods, to the VV search/field parameters would at least get the ball rolling. Users could then use the Custom Field Builder to build other algorithms of their choosing, like ATRP (Average True Range Percentage) (ATR/Actual Price), which would enable stock to stock comparison for volatility. BOTH ATR and ATRP should also be made available at the same time for Graph Layouts, so it would like in the attachment.
Michael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Ellis
commented
To clarify a little, adding a minimum of ATR (10) and ATR(14), the two most common periods, to the VV search/field parameters would at least get the ball rolling. Users could then use the Custom Field Builder to build other algorithms of their choosing, like ATRP (Average True Range Percentage) (ATR/Actual Price), which would enable stock to stock comparison for volatility. BOTH ATR and ATRP should also be made available at the same time for Graph Layouts, so it would like in the attachment.
Michael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Ellis
commented
I would prefer to see both ATR and ATRP (ATR/Actual Price) as graph layout criteria, so it would look like the attached view in Fidelity's Active Trader Pro.
Michael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Ellis
commented
Adding a minimum of ATR (10) and ATR(14), the two most common periods, to the VV parameters would at least get the ball rolling. Users could then use the Custom Field Builder to build other algorithms of their choosing, like ATRP (Average True Range Percentage) (ATR/Actual Price), which would enable stock to stock comparison for volatility. BOTH ATR and ATRP should also be made available at the same time in Graph Layouts.
Michael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Ellis
commented
The comments get a little esoteric, but adding a minimum of ATR (10) and ATR(14), the two most common periods, to the VV parameters would at least get the ball rolling. Users could then use the Custom Field Builder to build other algorithms of their choosing, like ATRP (Average True Range Percentage) (ATR/Actual Price), which would enable stock to stock comparison for volatility. BOTH ATR and ATRP should also be made available at the same time in Graph Layouts.
Michael Ellis
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Ellis
commented
The only thing I disagree with here is it should be ATR/Actual Price, not Price/ATR. The former gives the equivalent of a percentage that enables stock to stock comparison for volatility and an easy conversion to a 1X, 2X or 3X trailing stop. More specifically, too, it needs to be a parameter in both graph layout as well as search parameters.
Michael Ellis
supported this idea
·
Paul. Just throw out the carats and let the numerical values always be visible. We comparison look at those to see if a timing is about to trigger. This would make us have to execute 11 clicks whenever we wanted to do so. Clicks = time. Time = money. Or at best, wasted time. Golden rule.